Saturday, October 23, 2004

What's the difference between local application and web application?

I am looking in the future of web applications. Those applications could do something that we are doing with our local applications but running or look like running in a web browser.

But why we need those applications? There are several reasons.

  1. We want mobility.
    • We want to, most time we have to walk arround. For example, many times I have to work in my office for some time and then go to a library and then work at the library for some other time. I have a notebook, but I don't like to carry it with me all the time. And there are always some computers in the library, and there is always at least one web browser on each of those computers. I can use them.
  2. For the mobility, we want data to be centralized.
    • I hate to say, "Oh, my, I forget my data in the office." And I can put my data on the webserver and access them via web browser. But if we have the data centralized, we have to use network con retrieve the data.
  3. We want multi-platform compatibility.
    • I use different computers, and different people use different computers. No body want to write same application several times just for different platform. And as web content can be used by web browser, there problem of compatibility become no problem.
  4. We want to have pictures, videos and more...
    • All of those ability can be achieved by telnet. But we also want to use see the graphics and see the radios.
  5. Security concerns
    • And because of the security concerns, ports other than 80 has been closed in may computers. In some other case, even any application other than web browser has been shut off the net. Thus, telnet and other applications are forbidden to reach the web, we we have to use web browser. The other security concern is the encryption, the encrypt method used by browsers are well developed and we don need to concern the bugs.

And web applications are different from common applications. Those common applications retrieve data via network using what ever method and has full access to the local data. Web application has tow layers, the first layer is the web server side application. The data are stored on the web server and the server side have full access to the data. Then the server side application send the data in partially rendered form, like HTML or XML, to the web browser. The web broser render the data into understandable form.

The ability of web appliation to render the data is confined by the ability of webbroser to render HTML and the ability of web developer. The ability of web browser is limited, unfortunately. For example, by now, the round corner, which has been used on printed media for hundreds of years, has not been impleted on major browsers on a standard way.

The ability of HTTP is confined. Though we have XML now, XML can be used to transfer diferent kind of data with very complicated structure, the XML has its own problem.

XML is slow and resource demanding.

So over all, web applications have their own points. But the ability of web applications are limited. We may not be able to produce web application as powerful as common applications. But web applications do have their own points, like mobility and security.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very good page, nice nawigation, many things to read. And i havelaines cumshot*
cumshots on bangboat*
all gangbangs and*
captanstabin makayla*
captain stabin pics*
captin stabin passwords*
asian male picture*
anal indian swinger*
boatbangers throat*
all gangbang samples*

5:00 AM  
Blogger BLANCHE said...

Nice blog. Have you seen your google rating? BlogFlux It's Free and you can add a Little Script to your site that will tell everyone your ranking. I think yours was a 3. I guess you'll have to check it out.

Computer News
China's Google rockets on debut
It was a remarkable debut. Chinese search engine's shares sold in the United States for US$27 ($39) - then surged on day one to close at US$122.54 ($177.46).

Friday's result was the biggest first-day gain for a new listing in the US for five years.

Investors had more than quadrupled their money.

An analyst in New York with, a website devoted to initial public offerings, John Fitzgibbon, said: "This one is the return to the internet bubble. Last time we saw a deal skyrocket was during the frothy IPO markets of 1999 and 2000."

Then came the post-mortem.

Some analysts said the internet search engine could have had an even better payday for itself if underwriters had sold the deal at a higher price to begin with.

"It looks to me like the underwriters should have had a better indication of the appetite for this stock than they did," said Donald Straszheim, president of Straszheim Global Advisors.

Investors were eager to own a stake in a company that many say could grow as dramatically as Google and is based in a country itself undergoing explosive growth.

But other analysts are not so sure the underwriters made a mistake, given that the company's shares were priced at a relatively high multiple of revenues.

"It wasn't priced out of line with the rest of the market. In a situation like this, you're dealing with the unpredictability of the after market," said Tom Taulli, of Instream Partners in Newport Beach, California.

At issue is the underwriting process. Banks selling shares to the public - in this case Credit Suisse First Boston, Goldman Sachs, and Piper Jaffray - are paid to use quantitative models to determine a fair price for shares, but also to gauge investor demand.

Underwriting has both subjective and objective elements, making definitive evaluation of a bank's performance difficult. In this case, demand for the IPO was evidently outsized, but so were the unknowns for the company.

"We don't know the potential impact of censorship in China, or how quickly the internet will grow there," said David Menlow, president of Had the IPO been priced higher and then fallen in the first day of trading, investors could have sued. chairman and chief executive Robin Li, speaking on CNBC, said he was not upset by the potential lost proceeds of the IPO because the company had only sold a small portion of itself, and had significantly more growth ahead.

But University of Florida Professor Jay Ritter, an IPO expert, said left money on the table by introducing the shares at a level well below where they ended hours later.

Copyright ? - 2005 Entireweb


10:49 AM  
Blogger unixlinux said...

Nice KDE rlated blog. Visit my header kde blog.

9:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We found a simple and easy way to get infomation on [swinger dating]. If you are into [swinger dating] like my wife and I then you will want to go to [swinger dating] to get the latest info.

4:56 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think you're right on track and not many people are willing to admit that they share your views. lost premier season is an AWESOME place to discuss LOST.

2:47 PM  
Blogger Girly Girl said...

If you want over 18 adults only dating then Swinger Dating is the site for you. Totally free too :)

6:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My wife and I enjoy swinger couples. We decided to put together a site to help others who are interested in swinger couples. We hope you will check out our web site swinger couples Look for us. Our nick is "sdray69". CYA there!

6:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home